Some analysis for round 3 of #RheumJC
Overall (full 24hrs including both sessions) there were 63 total participants
- 20 people had participated in one of the two previous journal clubs
- 43 people were brand new
- 22 different countries were represented
Compared to last month, there were 17 more total participants
The total number of rheumatologists increased (34 in round 3, 25 in round 2)
- Additionally, this session saw a lot of cross-specialty interest with 3 nephrologists, 3 gastroenterologists, 3 internists, and 2 pediatricians also participating
For the full 24 hours, there were 569 total tweets – 390 unique tweets and 179 RTs
- Compared to round 1 – very similar: 506 total tweets – 410 unique tweets and 96 RTs
- Compared to round 2 – also very similar: 518 total tweets – 387 unique tweets and 117 RTs
In the 22 hours of asynchronous participation time (not including the 2 live sessions), the volume of tweets was relatively low (150 tweets – 26.4% of the total) and tended to be mostly RTs (63%)
The 2 live sessions accounted for 73.6% of the total tweet volume for the 24hrs
Almost 80% of the tweets during the live sessions were unique and only 20% of the tweets were RTs
Only 32 unique individuals participated in the two live sessions
Session 1 (3pm EST)
- 22 participants (5 Europe, 14 Americas, 3 Middle East)
- 6 fewer Europeans participated compared to round 2 session 1
- 3 people participated again in session 2 (9pm EST) including our guest author @RheumNow
- There were 208 total tweets – 159 unique tweets and 49 RTs
Session 2 (9pm EST)
- 13 participants (12 Americas, 1 Philippines)
- There were 211 total tweets – 175 unique tweets and 36 RTs
Symplur metrics from session 1